Back to Basics #43 - Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques

Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques – Back to Basics #43

Following some recent queries from our clients, we thought it would be helpful to provide a diagram highlighting the information (evidence) required to prepare a delay analysis utilising one of the main (6) techniques detailed in the Society for Construction Law Delay and Dispute Protocol. 

The protocol details six different methods of delay analysis. These are Impacted As-Planned, Time Impact, Time Slice Windows, As-Planned vs As-Built, Longest Path and Collapsed As-Built.

Each of these techniques have Strengths and Weaknesses (which we will detail in our next Back to Basics document on Saturday). 

The decision on which analysis technique is to be adopted is often dictated by the information available. The sample table below identifies which information is required and will help you understand which technique you could utilise based on information available.

The_Evidence_Required.jpg
Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques

Our Team of Specialists can help you identify what evidence is required for each delay analysis technique.

  • Sheffield (Head Office)

    The Annexe
    260 Ecclesall Road South
    Ecclesall
    Sheffield
    S11 9PS
    
    Tel – 0114 230 1329
    
    
  • London

    Adam House
    7-10 Adam Street
    London
    WC2N 6AA
    
    Tel – 020 7520 9295
    
    
  • Liverpool

    Horton House
    Exchange Flags
    Liverpool
    L2 3PF
    
    Tel- 0114 230 1329
    
  • Manchester

    3 Hardman Street
    Manchester
    M3 3HF
    
    Tel – 0114 230 1329
    
    
  • Birmingham

    Birmingham Business Park
    4200 Waterside Centre
    Solihull Parkway
    Birmingham
    B37 7YN
    
    Tel – 0121 481 2381