Back to Basics #43 - Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques

Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques – Back to Basics #43

Following some recent queries from our clients, we thought it would be helpful to provide a diagram highlighting the information (evidence) required to prepare a delay analysis utilising one of the main (6) techniques detailed in the Society for Construction Law Delay and Dispute Protocol. 

The protocol details six different methods of delay analysis. These are Impacted As-Planned, Time Impact, Time Slice Windows, As-Planned vs As-Built, Longest Path and Collapsed As-Built.

Each of these techniques have Strengths and Weaknesses (which we will detail in our next Back to Basics document on Saturday). 

The decision on which analysis technique is to be adopted is often dictated by the information available. The sample table below identifies which information is required and will help you understand which technique you could utilise based on information available.

Our Team of Specialists can help you identify what evidence is required for each delay analysis technique.

• Sheffield

  The Annexe,
  260 Ecclesall Road South,
  Ecclesall,
  Sheffield,
  S11 9PS

  Tel - 0114 230 1329

• London

  Adam House,
  7-10 Adam Street,
  London,
  WC2N 6AA

  Tel – 020 7520 9295

• Leeds

  Suite 69,
  4100 Park Approach,
  Thorpe Park,
  Leeds,
  LS15 8GB

  Tel - 0113 397 0358

• Warrington

  Suite 41,
  Lakeview 600,
  Lakeside Drive,
  Centre Park Square,
  Warrington,
  WA1 1RW

  Tel - 01925 984705

• Manchester

  3 Hardman Street,
  Manchester,
  M3 3HF

  Tel - 0114 230 1329

• Birmingham

  Birmingham Business Park,
  4200 Waterside Centre,
  Solihull Parkway,
  Birmingham,
  B37 7YN

  Tel - 0121 481 2381

• Liverpool

  Horton House,
  Exchange Flags,
  Liverpool,
  L2 3PF

  Tel - 07753 837149