Evidence Required for Various Delay Analysis Techniques – Back to Basics #43
Following some recent queries from our clients, we thought it would be helpful to provide a diagram highlighting the information (evidence) required to prepare a delay analysis utilising one of the main (6) techniques detailed in the Society for Construction Law Delay and Dispute Protocol.
The protocol details six different methods of delay analysis. These are Impacted As-Planned, Time Impact, Time Slice Windows, As-Planned vs As-Built, Longest Path and Collapsed As-Built.
Each of these techniques have Strengths and Weaknesses (which we will detail in our next Back to Basics document on Saturday).
The decision on which analysis technique is to be adopted is often dictated by the information available. The sample table below identifies which information is required and will help you understand which technique you could utilise based on information available.
Our Team of Specialists can help you identify what evidence is required for each delay analysis technique.
-
Sheffield (Head Office)
The Annexe 260 Ecclesall Road South Ecclesall Sheffield S11 9PS Tel – 0114 230 1329
-
London
Adam House 7-10 Adam Street London WC2N 6AA Tel – 020 7520 9295
-
Liverpool
Horton House Exchange Flags Liverpool L2 3PF Tel- 0114 230 1329
-
Manchester
3 Hardman Street Manchester M3 3HF Tel – 0114 230 1329
-
Birmingham
Birmingham Business Park 4200 Waterside Centre Solihull Parkway Birmingham B37 7YN Tel – 0121 481 2381